General
Belize National Forest Monitoring System 2001-2020BackgroundBelize’s diverse ecosystems, land tenure systems, and land-use dynamics require a robust and flexible National Forest Monitoring System (NFMS). Early efforts focused on establishing permanent forest inventory plots in the late 1990s to address data gaps in forest structure and carbon dynamics. Over time, Belize has expanded its forest monitoring framework to integrate both ground-based and remote sensing approaches, ensuring transparency, consistency, and national ownership of forest data systems. Open access copy available |
Framework for National Forest Monitoring SystemBackgroundOpen access copy available |
National forest monitoring system assessment tool – Quick guidanceBackgroundOpen access copy available |
User-Driven Land Cover Change Prediction Map Tool for Land Conservation PlanningBackgroundEffective conservation planning requires forward-looking tools that anticipate land cover change, rather than relying solely on historical analysis. Rapid urbanization and land-use change threaten ecosystems and biodiversity, particularly in regions experiencing development pressure. Traditional models often lack accessibility for nontechnical users, limiting their application in real-world decision-making. Integrating machine learning with user-friendly platforms can enhance stakeholder engagement and improve conservation outcomes. Open access copy available |
Integrating satellite-based forest disturbance alerts improves detection timeliness and confidenceBackgroundSatellite-based forest monitoring systems are essential for detecting deforestation and supporting climate change mitigation efforts. Multiple alert systems exist, including Global Land Analysis and Discovery (GLAD)-Landsat, GLAD-Sentinel-2, and RADD, each with distinct capabilities and limitations related to sensor type and environmental conditions. Optical systems struggle under cloud cover, while radar systems may miss certain disturbance signals. This creates uncertainty for users and highlights the need for integrated monitoring approaches. Open access copy available |
Near real-time monitoring of tropical forest disturbance by fusion of Landsat, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-1 dataBackgroundAvailable with subscription or purchase |
Afforestation and Reforestation Have Varying Biodiversity Impacts Across and Within BiomesBackgroundAfforestation and reforestation (AR) are widely promoted as nature-based solutions (NbS) for carbon dioxide removal and climate mitigation. Global initiatives aim to expand forest cover significantly to meet climate targets. However, AR can produce unintended biodiversity impacts, particularly when implemented in ecosystems such as grasslands or savannas, where native species are not adapted to forest conditions. The ecological outcomes of AR vary across biomes and species, highlighting the need for spatially explicit, biodiversity-sensitive planning frameworks. Open access copy available |
Enhancing Above-Ground Biomass Estimation in Agroforestry Systems: A Scalable Deep Learning Approach Using Sentinel-2 DataBackgroundOpen access copy available |
The rate of global sea level rise doubled during the past three decadesBackgroundTracking global mean sea level (GMSL) is important for both global climate monitoring and informing coastal communities’ adaptation strategies. Previous methods of tracking GMSL calculate the average rate of GMSL rise to be 3.3 mm/year based on satellite data over 30 years. However, studies since 2017 have identified a significant acceleration in GMSL rise. Thus, it is important to ensure that current GMSL rate estimates are accurate to inform both local and GMSL rise adaptation strategies. Open access copy available |
Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknownsBackgroundForests currently remove 2-3 GtC yr⁻¹ from the atmosphere, while global wood harvest exceeds 3-4 billion m³ yr⁻¹, creating complex interactions between forest carbon stocks, harvested wood products, and the substitution of wood for more emission-intensive materials. Lifecycle assessment (LCA) is widely used to evaluate these interactions, but differing system boundaries, baselines, and treatment of carbon pools can lead to very different conclusions about mitigation benefits. Clarifying where evidence is robust and where major uncertainties remain is essential for designing coherent forest-climate policy. Open access copy available |
