Could Payments for Forest Carbon Contribute to Improved Tropical Forest Management?
Background
This study addresses the ongoing debate over whether carbon finance can incentivize better logging practices, especially in areas where unregulated logging causes severe environmental degradation. Under the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), industrialized countries finance carbon sequestration projects in developing nations to help meet their emissions reduction targets. However, this approach raises concerns that such mechanisms may let developed countries delay cutting their own fossil fuel emissions. The paper investigates whether forest carbon payments can support improved natural forest management (NFM) in tropical regions.
Goals and Methods
The study evaluates the feasibility and potential impact of using carbon payments to promote better forest management in the tropics, particularly through the adoption of Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) and other sustainable forestry practices. The authors analyze empirical data and case studies from Asia and Latin America to compare the costs and benefits of NFM with those of conventional logging. They model changes in forest biomass over time under both management systems and calculate the potential carbon savings and financial trade-offs involved.
Conclusion
The study finds that while carbon payments have the potential to support improved forest management, the required financial compensation is often higher than previously assumed—especially in regions where frequent, unregulated logging is the norm. Nonetheless, the authors emphasize that the long-term carbon and biodiversity benefits of NFM are likely undervalued, particularly in areas where forests risk permanent degradation into shrubland or grassland. Despite financial and logistical barriers, the study suggests that targeted subsidies, stricter enforcement of logging standards, and integration with broader conservation efforts could improve the effectiveness and feasibility of forest carbon projects.
Reference:
Could payments for forest carbon contribute to improved tropical forest management?. Forest Policy and Economics. 2004;6(2):153 - 167. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00102-8.
.