Community and Participatory Monitoring

Regulating Green Finance and Managing Environmental Risks in the Conditions of Global Uncertainty

Background

This paper examines how growing global uncertainty, driven by geopolitical tensions, economic fragmentation, climate risks, and declining international cooperation, increases the environmental, energy, and socio-economic risks confronting countries. In this context, green finance is a strategic tool to support sustainable development and strengthen resilience; however, the green finance landscape remains highly fragmented, with uneven regulatory frameworks, large disparities between developed and developing countries, and persistent volatility that limits effective environmental risk management.

Open access copy available

Current trends and future directions for integrating social values into mangrove restoration

Background

Different communication styles, governance, and social issues create barriers to successful mangrove forest restoration projects, and may hinder the ability to scale up projects to meet global restoration goals. Incorporating social values and stakeholder preferences into restoration projects can help identify best management practices, promote successful outcomes, and prevent distrust and inequality between restoration practitioners and stakeholders with different needs and perceptions of mangrove forests.

Open access copy available

Indigenous territories and governance of forest restoration in the Xingu River (Brazil)

Background

Open access copy available

Hope for Threatened Tropical Biodiversity: Lessons from the Philippines

Background

Open access copy available

Automating violence? The anti-politics of ‘smart technology’ in biodiversity conservation

Background

Biodiversity conservation initiatives, such as the UN's post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (30x30), increasingly use smart technologies. Despite recognizing Indigenous and local rights for successful conservation, these initiatives often neglect customary rights and uses. Smart technologies, like AI, camera traps, and drones, enable new surveillance methods. State, private, and corporate actors, including big tech and BINGOs, actively adopt these tools to enhance data access and form smart governance networks.

Open access copy available

Indigenous knowledge and the shackles of wilderness

Background

Open access copy available

Promises and potentials do not grow trees and crops. A review of institutional and policy research in agroforestry for the Southern African region

BACKGROUND:

Agroforestry has been recognized for its potential to address land management challenges, improve food security, and support rural livelihoods, but its widespread adoption remains limited. Institutional and policy barriers, including weak coordination among sectors and inadequate incentives, hinder its integration into national and local frameworks. Strengthening policies, institutions, and research on the social and economic dimensions of agroforestry is essential for its successful implementation and long-term impact.

Open access copy available

What works in tropical forest conservation, and what does not: Effectiveness of four strategies in terms of environmental, social, and economic outcomes

Background

Open access copy available

Forest concessions in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala: A decade later

BACKGROUND:

Over the past few decades, there has been a significant shift in conservation strategies from traditional command-and-control approaches to more inclusive, community-focused philosophies. This transition was driven by the recognition of the failures of strict protectionism, which often led to diminished ecological and institutional resilience. Simultaneously, the recognition of rural communities as both impacted by and impactful within natural systems has grown, advocating for incentive-based, participatory strategies to address human-environment conflicts effectively.

Available with subscription or purchase

The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services

Background

The academic debate on how effectively Payments for Environmental Services (PES) achieve environmental and socioeconomic goals continues to grow. Researchers initially focused on defining the concept and documenting early field experiences. Over time, they shifted their attention to designing effective incentives, analyzing behavioral responses, conducting systematic reviews, and applying counterfactual-based impact evaluations to assess outcomes more rigorously.

Available with subscription or purchase
Subscribe to Community and Participatory Monitoring